The different views and interpretations of globalization

Postmodernism

As a proponent of anti-foundationalism and anti-essentialism within a pragmatist framework, he echoes the postmodern strain of conventionalism and relativismbut opposes much of postmodern thinking with his commitment to social liberalism.

Martin Heidegger[ edit ] Martin Heidegger rejected the philosophical basis of the concepts of "subjectivity" and "objectivity" and asserted that similar grounding oppositions in logic ultimately refer to one another. It was remarked that no such term or goal was included in the commitments the European nations gave in agreeing to the Marshall Plan.

In some hands, the reduction of globalism to the single ideology of market globalism and neoliberalism has led to confusion. The definition thus implies that there were pre-modern or traditional forms of globalism and globalization long before the driving force of capitalism sought to colonize every corner of the globe, for example, going back to the Roman Empire in the second century CE, and perhaps to the Greeks of the fifth-century BCE.

The scale was larger than just postmodernism alone; it must be interpreted through cultural studies where science and technology studies play a huge role.

Baudrillard proposes the notion that, in such a state, where subjects are detached from the outcomes of events political, literary, artistic, personal, or otherwiseevents no longer hold any particular sway on the subject nor have any identifiable context; they therefore have the effect of producing widespread indifference, detachment, and passivity in industrialized populations.

Similar to the act of September 11 and the symbols that were interpreted through this postmodern ideal, he continues to even describe this as " semiotic systems " that people use to make sense of their lives and the events that occur in them. As these ideologies settled, and as various processes of globalization intensified, they contributed to the consolidation of a connecting global imaginary.

The conclusion he depicts is simple: He stressed the historicity and cultural construction of concepts while simultaneously advocating the necessity of an atemporal and immanent apprehension of them.

Jean Baudrillard[ edit ] Jean Baudrillardin Simulacra and Simulationintroduced the concept that reality or the principle of " The Real " is short-circuited by the interchangeability of signs in an era whose communicative and semantic acts The different views and interpretations of globalization dominated by electronic media and digital technologies.

In this vein, he asserted that it was the task of contemporary philosophy to recover the original question of or "openness to" Dasein translated as Being or Being-there present in the Presocratic philosophers but normalized, neutered, and standardized since Plato.

Eclectic in his methodology, Jameson has continued a sustained examination of the role that periodization continues to play as a grounding assumption of critical methodologies in humanities disciplines. Kellner used science and technology studies as a major part of his analysis; he urged that the theory is incomplete without it.

One of the numerous yet appropriate definitions of postmodernism and the qualm aspect aids this attribute to seem perfectly accurate.

This crisis, insofar as it pertains to academia, concerns both the motivations and justification procedures for making research claims: Like Susan SontagJameson served to introduce a wide audience of American readers to key figures of the 20th century continental European intellectual left, particularly those associated with the Frankfurt Schoolstructuralismand post-structuralism.

To do this, however, a non-historical and, to a degree, self-referential engagement with whatever set of ideas, feelings or practices would permit both the non-fixed concept and reality of such a continuity was required—a continuity permitting the possible experience, possible existence indeed not only of beings but of all differences as they appeared and tended to develop.

Extensively, Kellner analyzes the terms of this theory in real-life experiences and examples. Richard Rorty[ edit ] Richard Rorty argues in Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature that contemporary analytic philosophy mistakenly imitates scientific methods. Instead, Foucault focused on the ways in which such constructs can foster cultural hegemonyviolence, and exclusion.

His terms defined in the depth of postmodernism are based on advancement, innovation, and adaptation. We The different views and interpretations of globalization now controlled not by binding extra-linguistic value paradigms defining notions of collective identity and ultimate purpose, but rather by our automatic responses to different species of "language games" a concept Lyotard imports from J.

In this latter premise, Heidegger shares an affinity with the late Romantic philosopher, Friedrich Nietzscheanother principal forerunner of post-structuralist and postmodernist thought.

In direct contradiction to what have been typified as modernist perspectives on epistemologyFoucault asserted that rational judgment, social practice, and what he called " biopower " are not only inseparable but co-determinant.

He has contributed extensive effort to explicating the importance of concepts of Utopia and Utopianism as driving forces in the cultural and intellectual movements of modernityand outlining the political and existential uncertainties that may result from the decline or suspension of this trend in the theorized state of postmodernity.

It is the generation by models of a real without origin or a reality: These metanarratives still remain in Western society but are now being undermined by rapid Informatization and the commercialization of the university and its functions.

His writings have had a major influence on the larger body of postmodern academic literature. This catalyst is used as a great representation due to the mere fact of the planned ambush and destruction of "symbols of globalization", insinuating the World Trade Center.

Knowledge thus becomes materialized and made into a commodity exchanged between producers and consumers; it ceases to be either an idealistic end-in-itself or a tool capable of bringing about liberty or social benefit; it is stripped of its humanistic and spiritual associations, its connection with education, teaching, and human development, being simply rendered as "data"—omnipresent, material, unending, and without any contexts or pre-requisites.

Instead of resisting the admission of this paradox in the search for understanding, Heidegger requires that we embrace it through an active process of elucidation he called the " hermeneutic circle ". Thus, his importance as a "translator" of their ideas to the common vocabularies of a variety of disciplines in the Anglo-American academic complex is equally as important as his own critical engagement with them.

The reality of the September 11 attacks on the United States of America is the catalyst for his explanation. For example, in his book The Collapse of Globalism and the Reinvention of the WorldCanadian philosopher John Ralston Saul treated globalism as coterminous with neoliberalism and neoliberal globalization.

He claimed that a constant stream of appearances and references without any direct consequences to viewers or readers could eventually render the division between appearance and object indiscernible, resulting, ironically, in the "disappearance" of mankind in what is, in effect, a virtual or holographic state, composed only of appearances.

He argued that, far from being an inevitable force, globalization is already breaking up into contradictory pieces and that citizens are reasserting their national interests in both positive and destructive ways.

He questions if the attacks are only able to be understood in a limited form of postmodern theory due to the level of irony. Alternatively, American political scientist Joseph Nyeco-founder of the international relations theory of neoliberalismgeneralized the term to argue that globalism refers to any description and explanation of a world which is characterized by networks of connections that span multi-continental distances; while globalization refers to the increase or decline in the degree of globalism.

Douglas Kellner[ edit ] In Analysis of the Journey, a journal birthed from postmodernism, Douglas Kellner insists that the "assumptions and procedures of modern theory" must be forgotten. History of the concept[ edit ] The word itself came into widespread usage, first and foremost in the United States, from the early s.

In their position of unprecedented power, US planners formulated policies to shape the kind of postwar world they wanted, which, in economic terms, meant a globe-spanning capitalist order centered exclusively upon the United States.Structuralism was a philosophical movement developed by French academics in the s, partly in response to French mi-centre.com has been seen variously as an expression of Modernism, High modernism, or postmodernism [by whom?

"Post-structuralists" were thinkers who moved away from the strict interpretations and applications of structuralist ideas. Definitions and interpretations. Paul James defines globalism, "at least in its more specific use, as the dominant ideology and subjectivity associated with different historically-dominant formations of global extension.

The definition thus implies that there were pre-modern or traditional forms of globalism and globalization long before the driving force of capitalism sought to colonize.

Download
The different views and interpretations of globalization
Rated 5/5 based on 49 review